22/01/2013
China (and Taiwan) has circulated the map of South China Sea with the U-shaped line (or nine-dotted line) in different internal documents and publications since 1948. However, it was not until 2009 that, for the first time, the People’s Republic of China included it in an official international document, namely in the Note Verbal sent to United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf to protest Vietnam and Malaysia joint submissions on the outer limit of their continental shelves in the South China Sea.
In recent years, China has increasingly used military and law-enforcement vessels, civilian ships and fishing boats to expand its presence within the U-shaped line and try to turn the waters within the line into Chinese maritime zones. At the same time, China has not yet officially clarified its claim and legal basis for the line, leading to a lot of speculations from the scholar community. There are different views and various possible interpretations of the legal status of the U-shaped line among Chinese and non-Chinese observers. This paper will examine the legal basis of all of these possible interpretations; try to find the official position of Chinese government regarding to the line and analyze reactions from international community. Then, it will conclude with suggestions for China (both mainland and Taiwan) to bring the line into conformity with international law, particularly the UNCLOS 1982, to defuse ambiguity and tension in the region.
(countinuing)
Read full text of this paper here
On April 24, 2025, the U.S. President issued the Executive Order “Unleashing America’s Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources” [1]. The order not only reflects a part of Trump administration 2.0’s policy regarding natural resources but also signals a strategic move to address U.S geopolitical and techno-economic...
The relations between Cambodia and the US have undergone many ups and downs since the normalization of diplomatic relations in 1993 and has been influenced by many factors such as history, differences in political freedom, democracy, human rights, and relations with China. During the first term of US...
After 50 days in office, the Trump 2.0 Administration has undertaken major shifts in foreign policy, inducing much uncertainty and confusion to allies and adversaries alike. Nevertheless, the United States’ engagement in the South China Sea under Trump 2.0 – or “Trump 2.0’s South China Sea policy” –...
On February 21, 2025, the Vietnamese Government issued a declaration establishing Viet Nam's baseline for measuring the breadth of Viet Nam’s territorial seas in the Gulf of Tonkin (or Gulf of Bac Bo).
DeepSeek’s responses on the South China Sea could suggest apprehensions for Vietnam, not just regarding territorial disputes but also sovereignty in cyberspace.
U.S. policy related to the South China Sea (SCS), influenced by multiple domestic and international factors, is embedded within the broader framework of U.S. policy toward China and the region. Under Trump 2.0, such a policy is anticipated to experience significant changes, thus prompting some unresolved...